Showing posts with label YMCA. Show all posts
Showing posts with label YMCA. Show all posts

Sunday, March 23, 2014

Why is Uncle Sam subsidizing these YMCA CEOs?

Pat Libby, who runs the Institute for Nonprofit Education and Research at the University of San Diego, said lawmakers are starting to take a closer look at salaries paid to charity officials.

“It goes to the question of public tax dollars,” she said. “Should people receive a tax deduction for contributing to organizations where executives are so highly compensated?”--San Diego Union Tribune


See also Robert Reich: “Paid-what-you’re-worth” is a toxic myth


The San Diego YMCA pays $544,172 to President and CEO Baron Herdelin-Doherty.

The organization is a bit secretive: it doesn't put its
Form 990 (tax form) on its website. Perhaps one of these
years Herdelin-Doherty will pull in over $1 million like
his predecessor (see San Diego Union-Tribune article below--
the SDUT managed to get a look at the 2009 Form 990).


My experience

I was delighted last July with my clever decision to take exercise classes at the YMCA.

But it didn't work out well. I wasn't able to make it to the classes I wanted to take. I had scheduling conflicts, an injury and I was out of the state for six weeks.

This wasn't the fault of the YMCA, but I'm wondering about their policy of taking $38 out of my checking account every month without regard to whether I am receiving any benefit.

I am thinking in particular about older members who may become incapacitated physically or mentally and who aren't able to make it to the Y to cancel their membership. Some of them might not have email, which is what I used to cancel my membership today. How long will that money keep flowing to the YMCA?

I called to express my concerns about this, but the membership director at the McGrath Family YMCA wasn't available--she was out of the office and wouldn't be available to talk to me for an hour or two. At least, that was the story I was given. But the minute I asked to talk to the executive director, what do you know? The membership director suddenly happened to walk into the office and got on the phone with me!

I said that was serendipitous, and she claimed that she didn't understand what I was talking about and that I should talk to someone else. So I am writing this as I wait for a call from Jennifer Pillsbury.

While waiting, I Googled the San Diego YMCA and discovered that their Form 990 (tax form) is not on their website!

Charity Navigator, however, has collected some information:
Compensation of Leaders (FYE 06/2012)

$544,172 Baron Herdelin-Doherty President, CEO
$187,500 Richard A. Collato Former President, CEO [The former president is still pulling in all this money? No wonder it cost me so much for classes. See below for San Diego Union-Tribune story about Collato.]

Now get this. Here's the mission of the YMCA:
Character development is an important part of the YMCA Mission and through all its programs the YMCA works at teaching young people to accept and demonstrate the four core values of Caring, Honesty, Respect and Responsibility in their daily lives.

Doesn't "responsibility" include putting your form 990 on your website? Doesn't "caring, honesty and respect" include not taking money from people when giving them nothing in return?


YMCA chief was paid nearly $1 million
The nonprofit says it was a one-year anomaly based on a retention package for the successful leader
By Jeff McDonald
SDUT
Dec. 9, 2010


Richard Collato

Tax form for the YMCA of San Diego County Pay compared

YMCA of San Diego County

President/CEO Richard Collato [Retired Sept. 30}
Compensation: $954,441
Gross receipts: $151.8 million
Employees: 4,178*
Endowment: $14.9 million

*Number provided by YMCA of San Diego County; 2008 tax records state 5,967; YMCA staff declined to explain the discrepancy

Story continued HERE.

Thursday, June 04, 2009

Self-dealing discovered among First 5 commissioners in San Diego

See all posts re First Five.


What if First 5 commissioners had really gone out looking for dedicated individuals who want to teach children? Maybe education in California would start to turn around.

I first read this story moments after finishing this post about the relationship between Chula Vista Elementary School District and the YMCA. Now I discover that the YMCA is involved in another scandal.


Deeper conflicts emerge in First 5 funding

Groups tied to advisers see millions in grants
By Jeff McDonald,
San Diego Union-Tribune
June 4, 2009

Background: First 5 San Diego Commissioner Charlene Tressler resigned Sunday, as questions arose about $8.3 million in agency grants paid to a charity and a private preschool run by Tressler.

What's new: The group's awarding of $67 million to organizations that employ its main advisory committee members also is raising questions.

Funds from First 5 San Diego awarded to organizations with ties to the commission's advisory committee, for the past three fiscal years:

2005-06: $33.76 million out of $90.93 million, or 37.1 percent of grant money given

2006-07: $10.16 million out of $22.9 million, or 44.4 percent

2007-08: $23.56 million out of $39.56 million, or 59.6 percent

The county's First 5 Commission has awarded at least $67 million in the past three years to nonprofits and other groups that employ people who serve on its top advisory committee, according to an analysis by The San Diego Union-Tribune.

The share of early childhood grants given to groups with ties to insiders has grown over the years, from 37.1 percent three years ago to 59.6 percent last year, the newspaper found.

The findings show that conflicts of interest at the agency go deeper than those of former Commissioner Charlene Tressler, who resigned Sunday as the newspaper prepared a report about First 5 funds granted to the charity that employs her.

Robert Fellmeth, a University of San Diego law professor and director of the Center for Public Interest Law, said public officials should know better than to steer so much money to groups with which they have close relationships.

“If you're making a decision on the allocation of public money, you or your direct employer or your personal interests should not be enriched by it,” Fellmeth said.


County Board of Supervisors Chairwoman Dianne Jacob chairs the First 5 Commission by virtue of her county post...

Jacob said it's time for “a complete housecleaning” within the organization... “It's the perception of a conflict of interest, even though the advisory committee does not make decisions.”

[Maura Larkins' comment: This reminds of the Voice of San Diego story about San Diego County Office of Education Superintendent Randolph Ward's claim that he makes decisions about hiring. SDCOE is also involved in this scandal.]


...Tressler cited health reasons in her letter of resignation Sunday, which the county made public Tuesday. County officials knew the Union-Tribune was planning to report about Tressler's votes in favor of a preschool program that sent more than $8 million to a charity she runs in Chula Vista.

In giving grants, Tressler and her colleagues relied on advice from a First 5 committee of experts...

[Maura Larkins' comment: Did they bend her elbow to make her give money to herself?]


Of $153.39 million given out, at least $67.48 million went to groups with that inside track. That's 44 percent.

Last year, the commission in part awarded $7 million to St. Vincent de Paul, $6 million to the San Diego County Office of Education and $3 million to YMCA Childcare Resource Service, all of which employ advisory committee members.

Michael Carr is the longtime executive director of SAY San Diego, which provides a variety of youth services and receives money from First 5. Carr is also a member of the First 5 Commission's advisory and finance committees.

Carr said he and other volunteers are aware of the potential for conflicting interests, but he noted that committee members are seated because of their expertise and they have no authority to spend money.

“It's a question of who's interested in this sort of public policy,” said Carr, who said he would quit the committee rather than stop delivering the services he provides with First 5 revenue.

“It's not my sense the majority of folks on (the advisory committee) agree to spend that amount of time because of funding opportunities,” Carr said.

Joan Zinser, interim First 5 San Diego executive director, would not directly say why so many commission grants were paid to groups with representatives on the advisory committee. Zinser said only that they are “hands-on providers, dealing directly with families we serve.”

Supervisor Ron Roberts, who last served as First 5 chair in 2007, said the distributions represent “a major conflict of interest” and the system of rotating First 5 chairs based on the supervisor chairmanship needs to be re-evaluated.

“The serial chair almost guarantees you have chairs coming in that don't have a good enough grasp to effect the change you need,” said Roberts, who last month publicly criticized the commission for sitting on a $200 million bank balance.

Proposition 10 deemed that there would be independent commissions in each county so that First 5 spending decisions would be local, rather than fall to state political leaders...

Sherry Novick, who runs the First 5 Association of California trade group, said... early-childhood experts in any region are too valuable as resources to exclude from programs simply because they also serve as advisers.

“Frequently, the best provider is the one who's done it the most,” said Novick, who offers regular training sessions for commissioners on avoiding conflicts of interest...

[Maura Larkins to Sherry Novick: Do they do it the most because they have friends in high places? Which came first, the political connections or the contracts?]

Other First 5 commissions around the state also have been criticized for awarding contracts to groups that advise the panels...


2005-06 grants

2006-07 grants

2007-08 grants


FIRST 5 TIES

Some of the organizations that received First 5 San Diego funds in 2008 and the commission advisers who work for them:

St. Vincent de Paul: $7 million, Ruth Newton

San Diego County Office of Education: $6 million, Linda Scarpa

Rady Children's Hospital: $3.6 million, Kristin Gist

YMCA Childcare Resource Service: $3 million, Debbie Macdonald

Family Health Centers of San Diego: $2.3 million, Fran Butler-Cohen

Palomar Pomerado Health: $1.7 million, Annamarie Martinez

SAY San Diego: $1.7 million, Michael Carr




"First 5" RELATED LINK

Watchdog Report ♦ Member of First 5 Commission steps down: Tressler reportedly had conflict of interest







"First 5" EARLIER STORY:


First 5's fund focus of county attention

By Jeff McDonald, Union-Tribune Staff Writer
May 24, 2009
FIRST 5 SAN DIEGO

Created in 1999 after California voters approved Proposition 10, imposing tobacco taxes to fund early-childhood programs.

The five-member commission is appointed by the county Board of Supervisors. The board chair serves as head of the commission.

State voters last week rejected the idea of taking First 5 early-childhood funds to help balance the budget, but in San Diego County, the Board of Supervisors may find a way to do it anyway.

County Supervisor Ron Roberts singled out First 5 San Diego earlier this month as he and his colleagues sliced 771 positions from the county work force and a handful of programs that help poor children.

“I was shocked to find that the First 5 commission has $200 million in the bank,” Roberts said. “That is not a prudent reserve; that is a sinful reserve. There's something seriously wrong with that organization.”

Roberts suggested that First 5 San Diego pay the $340,000 needed to keep open the county's Child Health and Youth Clinics program, which serves about 1,750 patients every year but is now slated to close June 12. Community clinics will be asked to pick up the slack.

...[Dianne] Jacob defended the healthy bank balance and said the amount of unencumbered money the commission has is actually closer to $75 million...


For starters, longtime Executive Director Laura Spiegel resigned days after a March meeting. The commission made no public announcement, and Jacob declined to discuss the reason for Spiegel's departure.


Former county Health and Human Services Agency official Joan Zinser has taken the reins on an interim basis. Jacob said the commission expects to name a permanent successor later this year...

Chula Vista Elementary's DASH & STRETCH deal with YMCA, pulled off by Lowell Billings and Pam Smith, reveals the underbelly of CVESD


Get ready to make some noise again Chula Vista! Salt Creek & South Bay 'Y' are holding focus groups tomorrow, June 4, 2009 and June 17, 2009 re: DASH/STRETCH.

June 4
5:30 - 6:30 p.m.
Here, you will get to speak.
Salt Creek Elementary School Auditorium
1055 Hunte Parkway
Chula Vista, CA 91914

June 17
11 - 12 and 12 - 1
South Bay YMCA
50 North 4th Ave., 91910


Earlier DASH & STRETCH posts are here.

The Dash & Stretch Story as told by a veteran DASH leader
San Diego Reader
By CVPFEP
Posted June 3, 2009
...Why wasn't Dr. Lowell Billings transparent with the parents and employees of the City of Chula Vista's DASH and STRETCH? That is a question that will remain unanswered as Dr. Lowell Billings will not comment on that...Double-Boarding a conflict of interest? Follow me: www.twitter.com/cvpfep


Care2 make a difference
While legally Dr. Lowell Billings & Pamela B. Smith may serve on two boards, namely CVESD & the YMCA's Board of Management, they were supposed to have abstained their votes on the March 10th, 2009 district board meeting as it was a clear conflict of interests.


Maura Larkins' response:

Here's what Robert Fellmeth, University of San Diego law professor and director of the Center for Public Interest Law, says, "[P]ublic officials should know better than to steer so much money to groups with which they have close relationships."

Shame on Pamela Smith for voting to give control of a school district program to a private charity she's involved in. (On the other hand, it helps explain why the YMCA would give her a "woman of distinction" award. But the web of longtime cronies involved in the DASH & STRETCH power grab extends beyond Lowell Billings and Pam Smith to Cheryl Cox, mayor of Chula Vista. Cox served on the CVESD board until 2006.

The DASH & STRETCH backroom deal is a small part of a much bigger problem.

Lowell Billings (like many other school superintendents) is paid big bucks to do whatever it takes to keep things calm and quiet in the school district.

He's also supposed to educate as many kids as possible while keeping things quiet, but when a choice has to be made between educating kids and keeping the power structure in place, the kids come in second place.

Mr. Billings seems to be good at covering up problems. This is why CVESD pays Lowell Billings one of the highest salaries of any public employee in San Diego County, while at the same time laying off the people who actually educate kids. (How much is Billings paid to do this? In the 2007-2008 fiscal year he was the fourth-highest earning public employee in San Diego County, earning $238,205. I would guess his salary was about $20,000 higher this past year.)

Like other school officials, CVESD board members are so paranoid that they feel threatened by every little complaint. They don't want issues addressed in a public forum; they believe democracy is the road to ruin. Voters must be kept in the dark because voters can't be trusted with the truth. They are the only ones worthy of being on the board, and they must do whatever they have to do to stay there, including ignoring conflict of interest and other laws.

You might not guess that arrogance and fear would be so closely intertwined, but both the arrogance and the paranoia are real.

Chula Vista Elementary School District has a particularly bad case of paranoia. Board members and administrators fear that their system would fall apart if parents, teachers or kids were allowed to express dissatisfaction. It's CVESD's reflex response is to silence complaints and to deny its mistakes. CVESD flounders for years covering up its blunders rather than solving its problems.

The deterioration of DASH & STRETCH at CVESD is an unfortunate event, but it's just a tiny part of the big problem in education: teacher quality. Politics, not competence, determines who teaches children. People love to moan about the problem of not being able to get rid of incompetent teachers, but the truth is that education wouldn't really improve much if each school got rid of its worst teacher and replaced that teacher with a barely-competent teacher. The standards need to be much higher.

Unfortunately, our society doesn't want to pay much for schools. One of Lowell Billings' jobs is to find a cheap way to put a teacher in every classroom (after first taking out plenty for himself and his lawyers, of course).

Adding to the problem, or perhaps, the very core of the problem, is that there is no effective system to evaluate teaching performance. Principals do observations, but they don't really know what's going on in classrooms, as reported in recent research.

Links on ineffective teacher evaluations:
Gotham Schools
Education Week
Voice of San Diego

As long as everything is peaceful and quiet, most administrators believe that everything is fine. And if kids end up as failures years later, very few people in the schools feel guilty. The United States has the highest incarceration rate in the world, but most school officials are apparently fine with that.

Schools teach that if we keep a low profile and don't make the people in power angry, we'll be among the "contributing" members of society. I disagree. I think that looking the other way when wrong is being done damages society. I hope that Elisa Betancourt will keep speaking out. There's plenty more to talk about, Elisa. Don't go away!

Thursday, April 09, 2009

Who's behind the power grab by YMCA?

Chula Vista Elementary School District and the City of Chula Vista appear to have a hidden agenda in turning over DASH and STRETCH to the YMCA.




Our Money's No Good

One of our own city council members told me and other parents that it's not about the money. Even if the city had a check for our district right now, they wouldn't take it to save DASH and STRETCH as is.

I can't give names or quote anyone because this chance conversation was off the record.

Think about it. The district's saying the programs will be the same, if not better and they're going to expand? How's that even possible with less money, new hire training (speaking of which, who's going to train them being that DASH and STRETCH staff haven't even been included?), and significantly less pay?

Okay parents, so if our district had nothing but the best intentions for our children, why didn't they give us the chance the Nature Center moms had? They raised $375,000 in three weeks! That was four months ago! Why didn't they approach the very people responsible for the overwhelming success of these two remarkable programs? Why did they approach an organization only known for it's on-site child care and off site programs?

DASH and STRETCH were created because there was a need. Our children's needs were not being met by any of the existing after school programs. Questions: How long has the YMCA's after school site been around? Exactly. In fact, if you look up the minutes from tonights meeting, you will see the underlined statement came from Pamela B. Smith herself.

We are we being told a story that doesn't add up. Yes, the fact that the city did not have the funds wasn't made "official" until just recently, but approaching the YMCA has been the districts only direction. Why did the 'Y' receive more notice than those directly affected by this? Why in the world did they post a message on their home page a day before this March 10th meeting stating that they're so grateful that the Y "saved" DASH and STRETCH if it wasn't even made official? Why did they send a pre-recorded message to parents in attempts to appease us a couple days before the March meeting? If their concern is to inform us, then what took them so long? And yet they say they didn't have to inform us that's why they didn't all those months ago. Then why suddenly decide to do it now?

DASH and STRETCH staff members are being told by some principals that they won't be 'here' next year. Teachers are congratulating DASH and STRETCH staff for having been saved. Fact is, that's not a fact.

Sounding fishy yet?

Teachers and school staff are congratulating DASH and STRETCH staff, only it's not for a job well done for these past ten years, it's for being saved. Only thing is, they haven't been. Most all DASH and STRETCH staff know what's really going on. Children are confused and crying while trusting parents are being fooled. Period.


To read the full version, go to: www.StretchDash.com

Elisa Betancourt
Wednesday, April 8, 2009

Write to: lowell.billings@cvesd.org







An Overdue Thank You...

Thank you DASH and STRETCH staff for being mentors, teachers, and friends to our children in our absence. Thank you for teaching them how to read, feel confident in themselves, make new friends, and learn to play a schoolyard games. Thank you for showing them how to become a better version of themselves, to feel and be happier and healthier individuals. The knowledge and education you brought, the passion, committment, and dedication you have are valued and will forever be remembered by those whose opinion matters most... the children. I apologize for the way our district has treated you during their "seamless transition." You have been the leaders and the reason our children have surpassed all expectations. Our hats off to you. I wish we could have done more.

Elisa Betancourt